Reebok BB 4000 II
For men 35+: fit, comfort and wear.
ReebokCourt shape
- Reviews
9 of 10 reviews recommend it.
1 has reservations.
Overall review score7.9/109 authorsWill it fit your foot?
- Length: True to size or small
- Width: Regular
- Toes: Reported pressure
Where can you wear it?
- Feels heavy on foot
- Worn for casual, travel
$90Budgetprice on the maker's site
Find on Google - Upperleather
- SoleRegular profile
- Coloursblack
Do Reebok BB 4000 II run big?
Length
BB 4000 II
- True to size.
- Reports differ: small or true to size.
How heavy do they feel?
Weight on foot
Feels lightOpinions differFeels heavy
How do they hold up over time?
What wears or breaks?
Reported locations, not a failure rate.Will they keep their looks?
Materials & everyday details
Upper material
leather
Sole shape
Regular profile
Materials & details
- Colour contrast
- Sole stands out from the upper
- Sole colours
- black / white
- Upper colours
- black
From maker pages; visual descriptions are our reading of their images. Details can vary across versions.
See them on video
REEBOK BB 4000 II "VECTOR NAVY/CHALK" REVIEW +ON FEET
Reebok - BB 4000 II - White Grey Green - Great Quality - Retro Style - Affordable Price - IG4790
Reebok BB4000 II Review: The MOST Underrated Retro Sneaker of the Year?! (On Feet & Sizing)
Reebok BB 4000 II
DETAILED LOOK AT THE REEBOK BB 4000 II MID
Bodega order came !! Reebok BB 4000 II’s and Hackers tee
Reebok BB 4000 II Mid Unboxing and On Feet Review
Gaya Kece dengan Reebok BB 4000 II untuk Bukber
Reebok BB 4000 II: Clásica y Versátil desde los 80
More videos
REEBOK BB 4000 II RETRO TRAINERS
REEBOK BB 4000 II (A closer look and on feet) #sneakerhead #reebok #basketball #nba
REEBOK BB 4000 II MID “CLASSIC MAROON” REVIEW + ON FEET
Y'all talkin' about the BB 4000's II Mid? ...
Estimate your cost per wear
About our research
Based on 21 reviews and other sources.
We compare owner feedback and reviews for fit, comfort and wear. Model details come from maker and retail information.
How we put the guide together →Compare with similar pairs
Similar uses, different fits and trade-offs. These are reports about each model, not a head-to-head test.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Superga 2750
Also used for casual. Compare length.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Superga 2750| What matters | Reebok BB 4000 II | Superga 2750 |
|---|
| Length | - True to size.
- Reports differ: small or true to size.
| - Reports differ: true to size or large.
2750 Cotu Classic - Reports differ: true to size or large.
|
|---|
| Width | | - Some reports disagree: regular.
|
|---|
| Weight on the foot | | 2750 Cotu Classic - Feels light to some wearers, heavy to others.
|
|---|
| Upper | leather | canvas / cotton |
|---|
| Sole shape | Regular profile | Regular profile |
|---|
| Maker price | $90 (price on the maker's site) | $65–$75 (price on the maker's site) |
|---|
Maker prices recorded 2026-09-26.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Cole Haan Grand Crosscourt
Also used for casual. Compare width.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Cole Haan Grand Crosscourt| What matters | Reebok BB 4000 II | Cole Haan Grand Crosscourt |
|---|
| Length | - True to size.
- Reports differ: small or true to size.
| - Reports differ: small or true to size.
|
|---|
| Width | | - Reports differ: narrow or wide.
|
|---|
| Weight on the foot | | - Opinions differ on whether it feels light.
|
|---|
| Upper | leather | leather |
|---|
| Sole shape | Regular profile | Chunky-looking |
|---|
Maker prices recorded 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-28.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Puma CA Pro
Also used for casual. Compare length.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Puma CA Pro| What matters | Reebok BB 4000 II | Puma CA Pro |
|---|
| Length | - True to size.
- Reports differ: small or true to size.
| |
|---|
| Width | | |
|---|
| Weight on the foot | | - Feels light to some wearers, heavy to others.
CA Pro Classic - Feels light to some wearers, heavy to others.
|
|---|
| Upper | leather | synthetic |
|---|
| Sole shape | Regular profile | Regular profile |
|---|
Maker prices recorded 2026-09-26.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Puma Clyde
Also used for casual. Compare length.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Puma Clyde| What matters | Reebok BB 4000 II | Puma Clyde |
|---|
| Length | - True to size.
- Reports differ: small or true to size.
| |
|---|
| Width | | |
|---|
| Upper | leather | suede |
|---|
| Sole shape | Regular profile | Regular profile |
|---|
| Maker price | $90 (price on the maker's site) | $110 (price on the maker's site) |
|---|
Maker prices recorded 2026-09-26.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Reebok Classic Nylon
Also used for casual. Compare length.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Reebok Classic Nylon| What matters | Reebok BB 4000 II | Reebok Classic Nylon |
|---|
| Length | - True to size.
- Reports differ: small or true to size.
| - narrow feetTrue to size.
- Reports differ: small, true to size or large.
|
|---|
| Width | | - narrow feetSnug across the foot.
- Reports differ: regular or wide.
|
|---|
| Weight on the foot | | |
|---|
| Upper | leather | nylon / suede |
|---|
| Sole shape | Regular profile | Regular profile |
|---|
Maker prices recorded 2026-09-26.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Converse Chuck 70
Also used for casual. Compare length.
Reebok BB 4000 II vs Converse Chuck 70| What matters | Reebok BB 4000 II | Converse Chuck 70 |
|---|
| Length | - True to size.
- Reports differ: small or true to size.
| - Reports differ: small, true to size or large.
Chuck 70 - Reports differ: true to size or large.
|
|---|
| Width | | Low Top - wide feetRoomy across the foot.
- Wide fit.
Chuck 70 - Reports differ: narrow or wide.
|
|---|
| Weight on the foot | | - Feels light to some wearers, heavy to others.
|
|---|
| Sole shape | Regular profile | Regular profile |
|---|
Maker prices recorded 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-23.

More about Reebok
Reebok in our guide: court and runner shapes. Explore the range and compare individual pairs.
Explore Reebok You might also like
More court shapes to explore. Open a pair for its fit and wear details.
More brands to explore
Other makers with court shapes in our catalogue.
Updated Sep 2026 · How we research